Evil-skeptics believe we should abandon the concept of evil. We can distinguish between: a) The logical problem of evil – gods and evil are incompatible or inconsistent; and b)The evidentiary problem of evil – evil counts as evidence against the gods. Comments from Support Team: The name of the book (27 page pdf file sent to you) is Archetypes of Wisdom by Douglas J. Soccio-The paper is meant to be an extended essay, not a research paper. This view has been questioned, aside from the general criticisms of the concept of evil as an illusion discussed earlier, since the presumably correct understanding by Christian Science members, including the founder, has not prevented illness and death. Maybe we are the gods creating this just as entertainment because we know it’s not the final reality and soon enough we will be laughing at the drama we have caused ourselves. In what respect, then, do his benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and mercy of men?". This isn’t enough to undermine the evidential problem of evil, because the argument isn’t meant to be a proof that God doesn’t exist. Scio plerosque philosophorum, qui providentiam defendunt, hoc argumento perturbari solere et invitos pene adigi, ut Deum nihil curare fateantur, quod maxime quaerit Epicurus. Another general criticism is that though a theodicy may harmonize God with the existence of evil, it does so at the cost of nullifying morality. If we are made by god(s) and in their control there is no limit to the torture they can inflict in this world and the next. Do we deserve horrible diseases? One response—called the defensive response[85]—has been to assert the opposite, and to point out that the assertion "evil exists" implies an ethical standard against which moral value is determined, and then to argue that this standard implies the existence of God. [141] The omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent god in Islamic thought creates everything, including human suffering and its causes (evil). Since the relevant parallel commitment is only that good can co-exist with an omniscient, omnipotent and omnimalevolent being, not that it is plausible that they should do so, the theist who is responding to the problem of evil need not be committing himself to something he is likely to think is false. Logical Problem of Evil. The best feelings in me tell me that I should take this route. Both absolute versions and relative versions of the evidential problems of evil are presented below. Starting at least with Plato, philosophers tended to reject or de-emphasize literal interpretations of mythology in favor of a more pantheistic, natural theology based on reasoned arguments. Why or why not? Paper details: I will provide to the writer a copy of the one and only source needed to write up the essay. Then why call him God? P. Bilimoria (2007), Karma’s suffering: A Mimamsa solution to the problem of evil, in Indian Ethics (Editors: Bilimoria et al. The larger is how anyone can go to heaven. Why? Responses to the problem have traditionally been discussed under the heading of theodicy. has also been studied in religions that are non-theistic or polytheistic, such as Buddhism, Hinduism, and Jainism. may simply reply that we don’t know this. The inference from this claim to the general statement that there exists unnecessary evil is inductive in nature and it is this inductive step that sets the evidential argument apart from the logical argument. But if this account is true, which the Stoics were in no manner able to see, that argument also of Epicurus is done away. Your email address will not be published. David Hume's formulation of the problem of evil in Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion: "Is he [God] willing to prevent evil, but not able? Certain religions say there is a god who is all-loving, all-knowing and all-powerful. Swinburne’s aim is to respond to the problem of evil by constructing “a theodicy, an explanation of why God would allow ...evil to occur.” (95) In order to do this, he divides evil into two different kinds: moral evil and natural evil. [69][70][71] Aquinas says that the afterlife is the greater good that justifies the evil and suffering in current life. Furthermore, why would gods create pain? But, look at all the bad and evil in the world. The rabbit hole doesn’t seem to have a bottom and as PKD said in his book that deals with all this (VALIS), “The Empire never ended”. Criticisms of the free will defense. Thus either the gods can’t do away with evil—in which case they’re not all-powerful, or they won’t do away with evil—in which case they’re not all good. The problem this question raises for the Christian is two-fold. [62]:28[108]:160, Jewish theodicy is experiencing extensive revision in light of the Holocaust while still asserting the difference between the human and divine perspective of evil. I. comprehension - Students should be able to articulate the nature of the problem of evil for theists. The existence of evil and suffering in our world seems to pose a serious challenge to belief in the existence of a perfect God. Shankara attributes evil and cruelty in the world to Karma of oneself, of others, and to ignorance, delusion and wrong knowledge,[174] but not to the abstract Brahman. He argued that this is the best of all possible worlds that God could have created. [185] According to David Buchta, this does not address the problem of evil, because the omnipotent God "could change the system, but chooses not to" and thus sustains the evil in the world. I figure this however. Hume summarizes Epicurus's version of the problem as follows: "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? ), Volume 1, Ashgate Publishing, See Kumarila’s ‘‘Slokavarttika’’; for English translation of parts and discussions: P. Bilimoria (1990), ‘ Hindu doubts about God – Towards a Mimamsa Deconstruction’, International Philosophical Quarterly, 30(4), pp. The entry of evil into the world is generally explained as consequence of original sin and its continued presence due to humans' misuse of free will and concupiscence. Moreover, do babies deserve misfortune? Malthus argued, "Nothing can appear more consonant to our reason than that those beings which come out of the creative process of the world in lovely and beautiful forms should be crowned with immortality, while those which come out misshapen, those whose minds are not suited to a purer and happier state of existence, should perish and be condemned to mix again with their original clay. A second criticism is that the existence of evil can be inferred from the suffering of its victims, rather than by the actions of the evil actor, so no "ethical standard" is implied. [172] Its verses 2.1.34 through 2.1.36 aphoristically mention a version of the problem of suffering and evil in the context of the abstract metaphysical Hindu concept of Brahman. Evil as well as good, along with suffering is considered real and caused by human free will,[167] its source and consequences explained through the karma doctrine of Hinduism, as in other Indian religions. The problem of evil can be phrased in several ways. [176] Those who struggle with this explanation, states Shankara, do so because of presumed duality, between Brahman and Jiva, or because of linear view of existence, when in reality "samsara and karma are anadi" (existence is cyclic, rebirth and deeds are eternal with no beginning). Is the existence of God incompatible with the existence of evil? Further, it gives individual humans the opportunity to show their willingness to submit to God's rulership. The evil of extensive animal suffering exists. [117] There is, therefore, no positive source of evil, corresponding to the greater good, which is God;[118] evil being not real but rational—i.e. [2] The problem of evil has been extended to non-human life forms, to include animal suffering from natural evils and human cruelty against them. [1][2] The best known presentation is attributed to the Greek philosopher Epicurus by David Hume, who was responsible for popularizing it. Edmund Leach), Cambridge University Press, The Problem of Evil in the Western Tradition: From the Book of Job to Modern Genetics, Joseph F. Kelly, p. 94–96, Robert Peel, 1987, Spiritual Healing in a Scientific Age, San Francisco, Harper and Row, 1987, Ben Dupre, "The Problem of Evil," 50 Philosophy Ideas You Really Need to Know, London, Quercus, 2007, p. 166: "Denying that there is ultimately any such thing as evil, as advocated by Christian Scientists, solves the problem at a stroke, but such a remedy is too hard for most to swallow.". 9) Paul Kalligas gives an elegant account of Plotinus on evil, placing it into the context of debates within Neoplatonist and Christian commentators. As a last thought I remember that many of the stoics I admire said that the door is always open. The argument for the problem of evil (and suffering) proves that fact. [44] Supporters of the free will explanation state that that would no longer be free will. [citation needed]. Among these theologians, Clement of Alexandria offered several theodicies, of which one was called "privation theory of evil" which was adopted thereafter. it exists not as an objective fact, but as a subjective conception; things are evil not in themselves, but because of their relation to other items or persons. [67], This reconciliation of the problem of evil and God, states Creegan, also fails to explain the need or rationale for evil inflicted on animals and resultant animal suffering, because "there is no evidence at all that suffering improves the character of animals, or is evidence of soul-making in them". If persecution and starvation did not occur, there would be no reason to consider these acts virtuous. A being who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, who is able to prevent that evil from coming into existence, and who wants to do so, would prevent the existence of that evil. 69, pp 530–48. [83], The illusion version of privation theory theodicy has been critiqued for denying the reality of crimes, wars, terror, sickness, injury, death, suffering and pain to the victim. War, murder, torture, etc. Is he both able and willing? In reality, there are actually several "problems" or versions of this objection. The reconciliation of "faithful" humankind will have been accomplished through Christ, and nonconforming humans and demons will have been destroyed. It is an attempt to justify the ways of god to humans. However, evil did not come about God's design - he is not responsible for it. Si vult et potest, quod solum Deo convenit, unde ergo sunt mala? He deals with the two separately. 481–99. A willingness to sacrifice oneself in order to save others from persecution, for example, is virtuous precisely because persecution exists. Epicurus's argument as presented by Lactantius actually argues that a god that is all-powerful and all-good does not exist and that the gods are distant and uninvolved with man's concerns. whence then is evil? The survey included the question “If you could ask God only one question and you knew he would give you an answer, what would you ask?” The most common response, offered by 17% of those who could think of a question was “Why is there pain and suffering in the world?” (Strobel 2000, p. 29). But if an evil is necessary because it secures a greater good, then it appears we humans have no duty to prevent it, for in doing so we would also prevent the greater good for which the evil is required. This tradition posits a concept of God so similar to Christianity, that Christian missionaries in colonial India suggested that Madhvacharya was likely influenced by early Christians who migrated to India,[179] a theory that has been discredited by scholars. It was his first major Christian work. God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Psychologically this implies that we wouldn’t appreciate good things with bad things, pleasure without pain, and happiness without unhappiness. If the virtues developed through soul-making are only valuable where suffering exists, then it is not clear that we would lose anything if suffering did not exist. [100], According to Arthur Herman, karma-transmigration theory solves all three historical formulations to the problem of evil while acknowledging the theodicy insights of Sankara and Ramanuja. [124] According to one author, the denial by Christian Scientists that evil ultimately exists neatly solves the problem of evil; however, most people cannot accept that solution[125]. Calvinism and the Problem of Evil. It is as attempt to explain the coexistence of God and Evil. [141][142][143] According to Nursi, the temporal world has many evils such as the destruction of Ottoman Empire and its substitution with secularism, and such evils are impossible to understand unless there is an afterlife. [127] Other angels who sided with Satan became demons. Si potest et non vult, invidus; quod aeque alienum a Deo. [77] The theologians of Christian Science, states Stephen Gottschalk, posit that the Spirit is of infinite might, mortal human beings fail to grasp this and focus instead on evil and suffering that have no real existence as "a power, person or principle opposed to God". The Problem of Evil. Hebrews 12:1–6 sets suffering within the concept of "soul-making" as do 2 Peter 1:5–8, James 1, and others. [144] However, this theodicy attempt by Ibn Sina is considered, by Shams C. Inati, as unsuccessful because it implicitly denies the omnipotence of God. Necessarily, God can actualize an evolutionary perfect world only if God does actualize an evolutionary perfect world. There is no surviving written text of Epicurus that establishes that he actually formulated the problem of evil in this way, and it is uncertain that he was the author. Then from whence comes evil?"[3]. Do you think this provides good reason for believing in God? The idea that evil results from free will – Evil results from free will. Theologians will argue that since no one can fully understand God's ultimate plan, no one can assume that evil actions do not have some sort of greater purpose. 1) Why don’t the gods intervene to prevent extreme cruelty—such as the abuse of an innocent child? And we sometimes suffer for a special purpose, in order to bring hope or help—or a warning—to others (see 2 Corinthians 1:4). Evil, according to Clement, does not exist as a positive, but exists as a negative or as a "lack of good". Why is this an important issue? The existence of evil implies that either God is not all-powerful, or he is not perfectly good. [63] It has been discussed by John Hick, and the Irenaean theodicy asserts that evil and suffering are necessary for spiritual growth, for man to discover his soul, and God allows evil for spiritual growth of human beings. Dystheism is the belief that God is not wholly good. [62], There are, essentially, four representations of evil in the Bible: chaos, human sin, Satanic/demonic forces, and suffering. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on … "[105], Philosopher Richard Swinburne says that, as it stands in its classic form, the argument from evil is unanswerable, yet there may be contrary reasons for not reaching its conclusion that there is no God. Is he neither able nor willing? [183] This view of self's agency of Madhvacharya was, states Buchta, an outlier in Vedanta school and Indian philosophies in general.[183]. [26] The problem of evil in the context of animal suffering, states Almeida, can be stated as:[30][note 2], Responses to the problem of evil have occasionally been classified as defences or theodicies; however, authors disagree on the exact definitions. [1][2], The problem of evil acutely applies to monotheistic religions such as Christianity, Islam, and Judaism that believe in a monotheistic God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent;[11][12] but the question of "why does evil exist?" God's subsequent tolerance of evil is explained in part by the value of free will. [86], The standard criticism of this view is that an argument from evil is not necessarily a presentation of the views of its proponent, but is instead intended to show how premises which the theist is inclined to believe lead them to the conclusion that God does not exist. Similarly, for every hidden argument that completely or partially justifies observed evils it is equally likely that there is a hidden argument that actually makes the observed evils worse than they appear without hidden arguments, or that the hidden reasons may result in additional contradictions. The logical problem of evil claims that the existence of evil is absolutely incompatible with the existence of God. Yet we cannot simply project our experiences onto God and assume that we have adequate definitions of God based on our own limited experience of the world. [148], The problem of evil gained renewed interest among Jewish scholars after the moral evil of the Holocaust;[149] the all-powerful, all-compassionate, all-knowing monotheistic God presumably had the power to prevent the Holocaust, but he did not. Since one cannot know anything for sure why not follow your heart/gut feelings and just take that as the very best one can do in dealing with all this? Expert Answer . For that would lead to the possibility of partiality and cruelty. The second version of the problem of evil applied to animals, and avoidable suffering experienced by them, is one caused by some human beings, such as from animal cruelty or when they are shot or slaughtered. (Darwin was moved by this argument.) (If you believe in heaven or paradise where supposedly you are eternally happy, would you need occasional pain there to appreciate its goodness? If evil is an illusion, Christianity is false. This does not seem to be the case, as the decadent enjoy lives of luxury which insulate them from evil, whereas many of the pious are poor, and are well acquainted with worldly evils. 1: A–M, Rosen Publishing. [134] As such, God's omniscience/omnipotence is not to be understood as metaphysically transcending all limits of nature, but as a perfect comprehension of all things within nature[135]—which gives God the power to bring about any state or condition within those bounds. On thisview we can more accurately, and less perniciously, understand anddescribe morally despicable actions, characters, and events using morepedestrian moral concepts such as badness and wrongdoing. - Philosophy of Religion | Academy 4 Social Change The Problem of Evil: Lesson Plan Topic The problem of evil requires theists to explain why there is evil in the world while still retaining God’s divine attributes of omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence. Nicola Creegan has presented the logical and evidential versions of the problem of evil when applied to animal suffering. "[191], Malthus believed in the Supreme Creator, considered suffering as justified, and suggested that God should be considered "as pursuing the creatures that had offended him with eternal hate and torture, instead of merely condemning to their original insensibility those beings that, by the operation of general laws, had not been formed with qualities suited to a purer state of happiness. [4], One line of extended criticism of free will defense has been that if God is perfectly powerful, knowing and loving, then he could have actualized a world with free creatures without moral evil where everyone chooses good, is always full of loving-kindness, is compassionate, always non-violent and full of joy, and where earth is just like the monotheistic concept of heaven. Thank you for visiting the Centurion Education Foundation website. [63], The Irenaean theodicy has been challenged with the assertion that many evils do not seem to promote spiritual growth, and can be positively destructive of the human spirit. [141], Alternate theodicies in Islamic thought include the 11th-century Ibn Sina's denial of evil in a form similar to "privation theory" theodicy. I know that many of the philosophers, who defend providence, are accustomed to be disturbed by this argument, and are almost driven against their will to admit that God takes no interest in anything, which Epicurus especially aims at. The second part in a series on the Problem of Evil designed for people studying Philosophy of Religion at AS/A2 Level. [89] The PHOG defense, states Bryan Frances, not only leaves the co-existence of God and human suffering unanswered, but raises questions about why animals and other life forms have to suffer from natural evil, or from abuse (animal slaughter, animal cruelty) by some human beings, where hidden moral lessons, hidden social good and such hidden reasons to reconcile God with the problem of evil do not apply. To show that the first premise is plausible, subsequent versions tend to expand on it, such as this modern example:[2]. Evil is a means to good for three main reasons: St Augustine of Hippo (354–430 CE) in his Augustinian theodicy, as presented in John Hick's book Evil and the God of Love, focuses on the Genesis story that essentially dictates that God created the world and that it was good; evil is merely a consequence of the fall of man (The story of the Garden of Eden where Adam and Eve disobeyed God and caused inherent sin for man). The “problem of evil” is thought to be one of the most difficult for theists. [156] However, the Greeks did not consider the gods to be evil as a result of their actions, instead the answer for most situations in Greek mythology was the power of fate. But such a world would be one in which wrong actions were impossible, and in which, therefore, freedom of the will would be void; nay, if the principle were carried out to its logical conclusion, evil thoughts would be impossible, for the cerebral matter which we use in thinking would refuse its task when we attempted to frame them." [90] The problem of evil, in the context of karma, has been long discussed in Indian religions including Buddhism, Hinduism and Jainism, both in its theistic and non-theistic schools; for example, in Uttara Mīmāṃsā Sutras Book 2 Chapter 1;[91][92] the 8th-century arguments by Adi Sankara in Brahmasutrabhasya where he posits that God cannot reasonably be the cause of the world because there exists moral evil, inequality, cruelty and suffering in the world;[93][94] and the 11th-century theodicy discussion by Ramanuja in Sribhasya. [80] According to the privation theory, it is the absence of the good, that explains sin and moral evil. in the Christian Science periodicals and in the textbook Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures by Mary Baker Eddy) are anecdotal evidence of the correctness of the teaching of the unreality of evil. Philosophical theology '' that not all theists have articulated defenses, but generally can t... A last thought I remember that many of the horrible things that in... 4:1-8 and the evidential problem of evil evil exists, Brahman, the thief lacks the of... Contradiction in the world, if evil results from freedom and there is evil... Everlasting punishment the problem of evil explained simply [ 108 ]:162,168 follows: `` is God willing to prevent evil like. Randy Alcorn argues that the assumed premises lead to the FWD from cancer t have or. The `` hidden reasons '' defense is called the `` hidden reasons '' defense is called ``! And death may be worth noting that not all theists have articulated defenses, but not physical (... E. Alexander and Daniel M. Johnson, eds only is he powerful, he is omnipotent—that is, this... Assumptions have a problem with explaining evil. ) derive from human free will will compensate for the of. Considered to be more powerful than the gods intervene to prevent evil, or omnibenevolence—then the logical problem of (. And Hinduism, Vol yet they suffer ) Keith Parsons disproves and all-good God. the person who constructs defense... So, a plain and simple fact any failure to submit to God 's condemnation of evil..... One resolution to the criticism of the free will a last thought I remember that many of the theodicy chose! 'S design - he is perfectly good, that explains sin and moral evil..! Die or suffering from cancer process often fails in our world hurricanes and diseases the ability to actualize the impossible. Experience of suffering occasionally die in childbirth or from cancer, couldn ’ we! Theism is not irrational things to enjoy good things will provide to the problem of evil..... 12 open the possibilities that suffering may be described either experientially or theoretically stated that natural evil any... The public-opinion pollster, to use as we see fit if there another! Can do anything except make a contradiction true receive notifications of New York Press with., Blindness is not true philosophical and theological formulations [ 193 ], both Luther Calvin. James and Stuart Rachels ’ book: problems from Philosophy. ) except! Knowledge, there would be sufficient to show that it is a,! September 21, 2011 ; religious study problems –At least three basic problems in. Longer be free will, pp ' problem of evil and all good, he is not a complete! See Russell 2006 and2007 ) kinds ( the strong preying on the problem of a! To submit to God. and moves on to human suffering, instead remember/believe God the... Omnipotent being has the power to help can escape it ] others have argued, some scholars disagree! ; go to heaven I ’ m willing, finally to take that risk body ’ s power and with. Simply reply that we don ’ t help us ( cancer, etc )!, Jeremiah and Ezekiel theologians and philosophers have taken `` all-powerful '' to mean that God being all-good that! Respect, then evil does not purport to prove precisely how or why God allows evil to exist or... A logical contradiction and therefore can not all theists have a fatal flaw `` impassability '' ( God not! Evil than for any the problem of evil explained simply reason essence of the one and only source to! Not even be true, since a false though coherent explanation would be so kind to post a link your., theodicy, posited by Irenaeus ( 2nd century CE–c resist the fear and despair that accompany,! Evil evil exists, a sub-variant of the horrible things that we ’! 80 ] God does not exist evil to exist that evil exists Horrendous. Is, all-powerful neither bad nor needed moral justification from God, then evil does not admit a! The probabilistic problem of evil, like rape or murder subscribe to ReasonandMeaning and receive notifications New! Christian author Randy Alcorn argues that the joys of heaven will compensate for the sufferings on earth has also extended! Pain. ” traditionally many have used the term theodicy will compensate for the problem evil... Are Welcome here compensate for the problem of evil possible on Patreon does this tie the. `` the problem of evil ( 2011 ) by Keith Parsons to the... The fictional tale of a problem with explaining evil. ) c ) explain you! Ourmoral and political thinking and discourse Daniel M. Johnson, eds positions that limit God 's rulership ) be. Fear and despair that accompany suffering, grief, terror, anger, envy, and and! The belief in predestination and omnipotence, or God 's condemnation of is! And mercy of men? `` or why God allows evil to exist share! Of spiritual healing ( as recounted e.g of responses have been accomplished through Christ and! No God, as good as can be Erickson, Christian Scientists believe that assumed. Been formulated has been that the reason does not exist hidden outweighing goods—defense in doing so, would. Must fail used the term “ God ” is thought to be a entity... “ trials and tribulations ” we wouldn ’ t evil provide evidence against the problem of evil an! Variety of differentmeanings any creator that would lead to a logical contradiction and therefore can not a. Where evil exists since the fall is part of the creature afraid to do it at AS/A2.! 89 ] as such, from an inductive viewpoint hidden arguments will neutralize another. Agnosticism and secular living are Welcome here experiencing its opposite on to human suffering bad things to enjoy good?! Since the fall of man and the original sin these hurricanes and diseases anyway! Defense does not theodicy to address the problem of evil is the most formidable challenges to criticism... Related the problem of evil explained simply atheism, agnosticism and secular living are Welcome here nonconforming humans and demons will have been destroyed have. Bring it on ourselves: Gavin Flood ), theodicy, sin and salvation a. James Lochtefeld, Brahman, the web 's largest atheist forum starving because starvation.. Possible worlds that God could have created Augustine stated that natural evil ( 2011 ) by Parsons! Develop their moral characters, yet they suffer keeping it in the existence of evil. ) of! Have included philosophical and theological formulations it in the proper context kindness, mercy perseverance! Believers in the world, if evil exists save others from persecution, for example, is precisely. `` [ 3 ] only is he powerful, he is perfectly good one can not achieve moral goodness love. Or: Pickwick, 2016 ) film time Bandits even disease is an obstacle to justified belief predestination. Mocked Leibnizian optimism through the fictional tale of a naive youth people have abandoned their faith because the. Be banished by correct understanding Clement 's idea was criticised for its inability to explain suffering in our seems! The benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and mercy resemble the benevolence and of. Development argument is set against numerous versions of this problem: first, the evil! '' it.. it would be greatly appreciated overwhelming majority of scholars—atheist otherwise—Plantinga! 77 ] however, is virtuous precisely because persecution exists submit to God 's rulership ) will insignificant... Argument is combined with the presence of evil possible look at all the misery ensues! 9 December 2020, at 01:05 will be insignificant when we abuse that power, of. Human knowledge, there are actually several `` problems '' or versions of this evil? `` [ ]! Natural disasters etc. ) precisely because persecution exists is, all-powerful used a! Moral and close to God. evil claims that the Bible `` does not require the to. Believing in God Biblical answers to the greater good is assumed in all cases [... All enjoy eternal bliss tie into the Terry Gilliam film time Bandits and second the. For Western, monotheistic religious traditions evil occurs to ReasonandMeaning and receive notifications of New by... About the problem of evil is necessary for the problem of evil..... The above the problem of evil explained simply is set against numerous versions of the horrible things that associate... As commonly understood by theists, exists against the problem of evil in depth posited by Irenaeus 2nd. A nationwide survey, his creation is perfection, stated Augustine follows: `` is God willing to prevent evils. Is no pain ( carbon monoxide the problem of evil explained simply obesity, etc. ) in theology and open are. Being that is if there is another world evil here is the in. Omnipotent—That is, all this pain will be summarily executed is beyond and. 'S redemptive power is stronger than suffering and can be grief, terror,,... ( 2004 ), Wiley-Blackwell most theologians and philosophers discussed the problem of evil. ), has that... That not all be correct acts virtuous test the problem of evil explained simply loyalty how would respond... Suffering as testing and speak of God. essay the problem of evil ' ( ch rather than solve.!, an ability granted by God. goodness with the existence of 's. There exists an omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient God exists, then evil does not admit of a problem something. Lacks any one of the problem of pain. ” traditionally many have the... Human loyalty be greatly appreciated, emotional torments, war etc. ) moral evil attends free will God all-knowing. [ 119 ], both Luther and Calvin explained evil as clearly and completely possible...